Section 230 played a critical role in creating the internet as we know it. Unfortunately, it also acclimated a whole generation to a world where content can be taken down merely for being offensive.
In this special—and extremely spicy—episode of Innovation Café, I challenged my taste buds (and sanity) by downing multiple Thai chili peppers (ranging from 50,000 to 100,000 on the Scoville scale) while venting about the difficulties small inventors face in the U.S. patent system. If you see me sweating, it’s not just the chilies. It’s also the frustration of dealing with a process so skewed toward big corporations, wealthy tech giants, and anyone with a war chest of cash to spend on patent litigation. This post dives into what’s making me so “steaming mad” and the specific hurdles innovators encounter—minus any actual flames.
It sounds wonky, but the “nondelegation” doctrine could affect who makes the rules that inventors and artists live by. This article addresses the constitutional question about how much power Congress can delegate to agencies like the patent office. It then explains in plain language why a legal principle from civics class might shape the future of innovation and creative industries.
Who foots the bill at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office? Mostly inventors themselves. This historical look explains how the USPTO is funded by user fees (and what happens when those funds get diverted elsewhere). Learn why funding quirks can affect patent examination speed and quality, and what it means for innovators counting on timely patents.
Imagine inventing something so sensitive, the government puts it under wraps. This article explores the rare situation when the U.S. government issues a secrecy order on a patent application in the name of national security. Learn how and why some cutting-edge innovations—like advanced tech or defense-related inventions—get temporarily classified, and what that means for the inventors behind them.
